Your Paper, The Right Path. Every thing must certanly be made as facile as it is possible, not easier.

Your Paper, The Right Path. Every thing must certanly be made as facile as it is possible, not easier.

– Caused By Albert Einstein


Prezi for more information on Your Paper, your path

A recurring plea from scientists is actually to simplify the entire process of preparing and publishing documents. With every log having various technical and formatting requirements and several documents being submitted over and over again before book, writers find it onerous to own to invest time that is valuable in the place of engaging utilizing the more effective areas of research. In reality, almost one in three scientists suggested “preparing manuscripts” when asked what work tasks they discovered many difficult or time intensive, in a study completed by Elsevier’s analysis and Academic Relations department in 2012.

Utilizing the purpose of making the distribution process easier, the Elsevier log, complimentary revolutionary Biology and Medicine launched Your Paper, Your Way (YPYW) last year. YPYW is a less strenuous distribution process, centering on the standard of the technology into the initial stages of distribution and just needing elements required for eventual manufacturing during the revision phase. If documents are refused, this easier distribution procedure saves authors time and effort and in addition, might help them attain quicker book rates.

YPYW has been extended to hundreds of Elsevier journals. Every log that provides YPYW demonstrably shows this at the start of its guide for writers, the following:

” We currently differentiate amongst the demands for brand new and revised submissions. You could elect to submit your manuscript being a solitary term or pdf file to be utilized into the refereeing procedure. Only once your paper has reached the modification phase, are you considering required to place your paper as a ‘correct structure’ for acceptance and supply those items needed for the book of one’s article.”

Your Paper, Your Path needs

  • Authors may submit their manuscript (text, numbers and tables) being a file that is single. This is A term or PDF essay writing website file, in every structure or layout, and numbers and tables may be put inside the text.
  • Numbers must be of high quality that is enough refereeing.
  • There aren’t any formatting that is strict but all manuscripts must retain the crucial elements necessary to evaluate a manuscript (Abstract, keyword phrases, Introduction, Materials & practices, outcomes, Conclusions, Artwork and Tables with Captions).
  • Sources could be in every style or format, as long since the style is consistent. Author(s) name(s), journal title/book name, article title (where needed), 12 months of book, amount & issue /book chapter while the pagination must certanly be present. Usage of DOI is very motivated. The guide design employed by the log will be reproduced to your accepted article by Elsevier during the proof phase.
  • Whenever a paper reaches the modification phase, writers will likely to be required to supply any items which will always be needed for book, as an example editable source files.

Reactions to YPYW

YPYW was absolutely received by writers. In a study sent by Elsevier’s analysis and Academic Relations department to writers that has chosen YPYW whenever publishing their manuscript, for the 3,958 writers surveyed, 70% reacted absolutely whenever asked, “Did Your Paper, your path lessen the period of time it normally takes to format and submit the manuscript?” Responses received from surveyed writers included:

. time-consuming formatting work ended up being maybe maybe maybe not undertaken needlessly.

I did not need certainly to spend your time with formatting before being yes in regards to the acceptance.

It had been easier and faster than [the] traditional one. I believe it’s a way that is good speed the method.

92% of writers surveyed found YPYW effortless or exceptionally simple, when compared with 61per cent of writers who utilized the conventional procedure.

To judge the effect on reviewers, 870 reactions from Elsevier’s current Reviewer Feedback Programme (RFP) were analyzed, of which 346 associated with a YPYW submission. There have been no differences that are significant reviewer satisfaction. Some reviewers have complimented the noticeable modification since it makes their everyday lives more straightforward to check out the numbers and tables in the text, versus at the conclusion for the manuscript as is usually needed.

Further reading

“Your Paper, Your Way”, Kelvin J A Davies, PhD, DSc, Editor-in-Chief, Complimentary Revolutionary Biology & Medicine

“Your Paper, the right path and also the reviewing procedure”, Catriona Fennell, Rebecca Barrie

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *